Miss B...
Great reply as always...
I work in a med lab twice a week and everyone I work
with has seen or even been in a video or two of mine.
My boss has watched some and of my stuff, and even
asked his boss if we could do a short documentary of
an angioplasty procedure...we got the thumbs up...I
was very surprised...we haven't actually made the
video yet, however later this fall I think we are
gonna get serious and make a little 15 minute
documentary on the whole process...

nathan miller
www.bicycle-sidewalk.com
--- missbhavens1969 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> God, is this ever disturbing. And dumb.
> 
> I get that your company wouldn't want its
> confidential information 
> spread around the internet; that makes perfect
> sense. I work in a 
> hospital. Pretty much all patient information is on
> computer, and 
> it's against the law (and morally inept) to share
> it, but my company 
> is too slow and sprawling and stupid to even think
> of removing email 
> applications from the very computers that store that
> information, 
> much less putting a 'no blogging' clause in our
> policy. I'm on one of 
> those computers right now. 
> 
> I'd get it if your contract had a 'no blogging about
> work' policy. In 
> my heart of hearts I'd know that it was simply for
> liability purposes 
> so they could cover their butts if some of their
> info got loose. But 
> even then, it seems like such a sad and desperate
> idea. No blogging? 
> Isn't this some sort of information systems company?
> How is it that 
> they don't know how anonymous the internet can
> really be? If you 
> wanted to you could be b/vlogging about all sorts of
> work-related 
> things and they'd never, ever be able to find you.
> Now, if you did it 
> FROM work, perhaps...but from your own home? It
> seems desperate 
> somehow. And Josh has made such an important point:
> why blogging? 
> What if it were something else? Under your contract
> could you not be 
> a freelance writer (I use writing because their
> policy doesn't seem 
> to take video into account) for a magazine or
> newspaper? What about a 
> neighborhood gazette? Pennysaver?  What if you
> independently 
> published the journal you'd been writing in a green
> Trapper Keeper? 
> Would that be okay?
> 
> I'm just sick at the idea that you'd be forced to
> stop posting videos 
> because of something this dumb. I totally understand
> if you do stop, 
> but yeesh. What's the world coming to? I guess I'm a
> little naive, 
> but I find it quite shocking. You don't even vlog
> about work!
> 
> Also, it scares me some. I DO vlog at or about work
> occasionally. 
> There's the odd video and then there's a seperate
> blog that's only 
> about hardcore hospital stuff. It's got several
> unpublished entries 
> lined up because I iz skared. The only related
> clause in my contract 
> states that I cannot talk to the media about any
> hospital-related 
> anythings. It doesn't define 'media' and is worded
> such that you walk 
> away from it with the impression that they mean
> "when Channel 7 jumps 
> out from behind the bushes with a microphone to ask
> you about a 
> scandal, don't say anything!". Still, I worry. I'd
> love to know how 
> many people on this list work for companies with
> policies like this. 
> Is this common? 
> 
> Whatever you choose to do, you've got my support.
> That being said, I 
> vote that you take it underground. Run off with
> Heath's idea, change 
> your name to Ethel Pettibone, do whatever you need
> to do. Just make 
> sure you let us know where to find your work!
> 
> ;)
> 
> Bekah 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "David Howell"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok. I work for a company where I am privy to vast
> amounts of 
> personal
> > and financial information for both individuals and
> enterprises.
> > 
> > My assumption is that they dont want that
> information to be 
> published
> > on blog sites for anyone to see. So, to guard
> against that I guess,
> > they say the employees arent allowed to have
> blogs. A rather archaic
> > method, to say the least, of preventing an
> information leak on such 
> a
> > grand scale that a blog would provide.
> > 
> > Personally I think it's just a way for them to get
> their rocks off 
> in
> > thinking they have full control over our personal
> lives. I in no way
> > understand why their rules are thus however if I
> break those rules, 
> as
> > it states in the policy I signed, I would be
> dismissed from my 
> position.
> > 
> > Again. I take full blame and am taking the weekend
> to decide if I
> > really want to work for a company that treats it's
> employees this 
> way.
> > I cant afford to be unemployed however this might
> just be the kick 
> in
> > the arse that pushes me into the freelancing world
> full-time rather
> > than evenings and weekends.
> > 
> > David
> > http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Josh Wolf
> <inthecity@> wrote:
> > >
> > > There's something strange about your company
> unilaterally 
> blocking  
> > > "advocacy groups," but I haven't the foggiest
> what you do, and 
> have  
> > > never worked somewhere with content filters so
> maybe it's all a 
> bit  
> > > more common than I realized.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > You state that the company policy is no blogs.
> What exactly is 
> the  
> > > purpose behind this ban? Would you be prohibited
> from writing a  
> > > letter to the editor? Publishing a paper-zine?
> Making your own 
> films  
> > > that were distributed through traditional means?
> It's all a bit  
> > > puzzling, you know?
> > > 
> > > Josh
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Sep 14, 2007, at 9:31 AM, David Howell wrote:
> > > 
> > > > My sites dont have anything to do with work.
> However the policy 
> states
> > > > that employees are not allowed to have blogs.
> Nothing further
> > > > detailing what type of blog employees are not
> allowed to have. 
> Just a
> > > > blanket statement. I knew that when I signed
> the policy and 
> agreed to
> > > > it. My own fault. I take full responsibility.
> > > >
> > > > I'll have to check that link out once I get
> home as according to
> > > > Websense here at work..."The category
> "Advocacy Groups" is 
> filtered."
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > > http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
> > > >
> > > > > Does your blog have to do with your work? If
> not, how can a 
> company
> > > > > tell you how to behave outside of your
> worktime? 
=== message truncated ===

Reply via email to