Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2009-02-12, Tony Mechelynck <antoine.mechely...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> And then there are people like me who can un- .zip files if they have >> to, but prefer to gunzip them (un- .gz), which is the Unix standard (as >> opposed to the Microsoft Megabucks LoseDough standard). And note that if >> the right tools are present (gunzip in the $PATH), a compressed vimball >> (*.vba.gz) will (if I'm not mistaken) be handled by Vim just as easily >> as an ordinary one. >> > > Yes, it will, except that when you open the gzipped file with > > vim someplugin.vba.gz > > the original file is automatically gunzipped and replaced by the > gunzipped version, e.g., somefile.vba. I wish the vimball plugin > wouldn't do that. If I'm going to keep the archive around for a > while, I'd rather keep it in its gzipped form. Besides, I should be > able to use vim to just look at a file without modifying it. > The reason why it does that: one can't source a buffer, and one can't source a compressed file.
Regards, Chip Campbell --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---