On 2010-05-18, Matt Wozniski wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Cesar Romani wrote: > > On 18/05/2010 04:24 a.m., Jeff Horelick wrote: > >> Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the > >> web in places that the whole: > >> > >> "link.sh: We don't need libXt!" > >> "link.sh: Removing libXt!" > >> > >> thing is a bit scary if you're new to compiling vim or compiling stuff > >> on linux in general because you might think its actually going to remove > >> libxt from your whole system. Because of this, I have attached a very > >> simple patch to change the link.sh echos to say delinking instead of > >> removing which sounds quite a bit less scary. > > > > I'd use unlinking instead of delinking. > > I'd say "Not linking in libXt" or "Removing libXt from libraries" or > "Going to link without libXt".
I was also going to suggest "not linking". Definitely not "unlinking". Think about that. Regards, Gary -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
