On May 18, 4:29 pm, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote: > Jeff Horelick wrote: > > Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout > > the web in places that the whole: > > > "link.sh: We don't need libXt!" > > "link.sh: Removing libXt!" > > > thing is a bit scary if you're new to compiling vim or compiling stuff on > > linux in general because you might think its actually going to remove libxt > > from your whole system. Because of this, I have attached a very simple patch > > to change the link.sh echos to say delinking instead of removing which > > sounds quite a bit less scary. > > Are these the same people that ask for a copy of the internet? > > Anyway, using "omit" instead of "remove" is probably better. > I don't know what "delinking" is. > > -- > hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: > 67. Your hard drive crashes. You haven't logged in for two hours. You start > to twitch. You pick up the phone and manually dial your ISP's access > number. You try to hum to communicate with the modem. You succeed. > > /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net --http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ > /// sponsor Vim, vote for features --http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/\\\ > \\\ download, build and distribute --http://www.A-A-P.org /// > \\\ help me help AIDS victims --http://ICCF-Holland.org /// > > -- > You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visithttp://www.vim.org/maillist.php
They're also likely the type of people who own the Brooklyn Bridge (does that "joke" work outside the US?). Omit sounds quite good to me. I used delinking because I was sort of under the impression that it built Vim linking to all these libraries and then link.sh stripped them out, but i could be wrong. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
