Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2010-05-18, Matt Wozniski wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Cesar Romani wrote:
On 18/05/2010 04:24 a.m., Jeff Horelick wrote:
Hey, i've noticed some people saying on IRC and randomly throughout the
web in places that the whole:
"link.sh: We don't need libXt!"
"link.sh: Removing libXt!"
thing is a bit scary if you're new to compiling vim or compiling stuff
on linux in general because you might think its actually going to remove
libxt from your whole system. Because of this, I have attached a very
simple patch to change the link.sh echos to say delinking instead of
removing which sounds quite a bit less scary.
I'd use unlinking instead of delinking.
I'd say "Not linking in libXt" or "Removing libXt from libraries" or
"Going to link without libXt".
I was also going to suggest "not linking". Definitely not
"unlinking". Think about that.
How about "link.sh: Vim doesn't need libXt, so you don't either! Am
uninstalling it now ... ... ... Done! (just kidding!)"
:)
Regards,
Chip Campbell
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
