On 2009-06-10 12:58 (-0400), Charles Campbell wrote: > So, an unrelated topic, no semantics in transition, no acknowledgement > of the original thread's subject == hijacked thread.
Or perhaps more accurately, a hijacked _subthread_. On 2009-06-10 19:10 (+0200), Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote: > If the change in the subject is not meant to adapt the subject for a > "morphing" thread? Sometimes the themes in a conversation suffer a > kind of "evolution", and in fact is better to change the subject in > that case. > > If you change the subject to start a new thread, you're "hijacking". Thanks both. I agree with you. "Hijacking" just sound so negative to me so I thought Charles meant it's something really bad. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
