There's nothing wrong with the Engine CR calculation spreadsheet I've been 
using.
It is my piston/ cyl. deck hieght of .040", plus a stock .008" paper 
cylinder gasket plus a special .040" aluminum head gasket (to compensate for 
previous fly-cutting of the heads....total deck equals 2.25mm, so my CR calc 
is correct.

Mike B.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "marc vellat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Air-Cooled Volkswagen Discussion List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [vintagvw] 40 horse expert 1961-1965 beetles


> Mike, I'd recommend that you toss that spreadsheet as
> far as you can and do the math yourself. I don't know
> where you got the idea that .040" = 2.25mm - either
> that's a typo or it's where your error is coming from,
> but either way you're FAR off.
>
> 83x64mm => 346.279cc
> 1mm piston deck @ 83mm bore => 5.411cc
> With 45cc chambers, that's (346.279+50.411)/50.411
> ...that's 7.87:1, not even close to 7.1:1... you'd
> need another 6.35cc to bring it that low. That'd take
> .045" more piston deck, which WOULD probably present a
> problem with intake manifold fit. The intake manifold
> can be tweaked enough to accomodate slight variations
> in engine width, not likely to be difficult until you
> get to +.050" or so - but you'd be +.090".
>
> You can safely run 87 (R+M)/2 octane fuel up to about
> 7.4:1 with a stock cam at sea level...The way fuel
> prices are these days I'd be inclined to go to ~7.7
> (that's about the max with a stock cam) and run
> mid-grade gas, the cost-per-mile should be the same or
> better.
> Personally I don't like to run that low of piston deck
> on an endurance engine - I would go with a minimum of
> .045" for 77mm and .050" for 83mm. Keeping the deck as
> close as possible to the lower safe limit will
> increase the "quench" effect, promoting better
> combustion characteristics and allowing a slightly
> higher C.R. than on a "non-squish" engine. But
> semi-hemi cutting also destroys the quench effect -
> it's a quick & dirty way to gain chamber volume. Far
> better to take the time to open the chambers up
> manually by laying back the walls while leaving as
> much of the flat quench surface as possible intact, or
> mill a shallow dish in the center of the piston top.
> I would run .050" deck which'd yield a C.R. of just
> under 7.7:1 with 45cc chambers, and plan on buying
> better gas. If you MUST run Regular, then stay with
> the same deck and open the chambers up by ~2.5cc -
> that'd bring it under 7.4:1.
> Cylinder base shims ARE available, just not as common
> as they are for later engines - and big-bore or not,
> the shim I.D. is the same (nominally 86.25mm). SOME
> 1200s had the larger 90mm opening found on 13/15/1600
> engines, but only late-model ones sold in other
> countries. These engines have strange cylinders that
> look like short 1300 jugs.
>
> I'm out-of-stock on all but .010" 40HP cylinder shims
> ($7.50/set + shipping, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Chirco lists .010"/.020"/.030"/.040" for $8.95/set
>
> --- Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>   I'm overhauling a 62/63 stale-air 40HP for my
>> beetle right now.  I'm
>> installing later heads (square rocker bosses) and
>> 83mm big-bore pistons and
>> cyls.  I found that my deck measured .040" (2.25mm)
>> and my stock head has
>> 45cc's combustion chamber volume.  This results in a
>> 7.1.1 CR, which
>> requires 87 octane gas minimum.  I'm installing
>> black cool tins under the
>> cyls, and have checked the thermostatic bellows for
>> proper opening @ 150*.
>>    If your head CC is 40 to 43cc's due to
>> fly-cutting,  then semi-hemi
>> cutting the heads and/or 'sinking' the valves will
>> increase the volume to
>> lower the CR. The 77mm stock cyls don't have the
>> luxury of having shims
>> available, but the 83mm big-bores will use the same
>> shims as a stock 1600cc
>> engine with 87mm cyls.
>>   Boston Bob told me that the limited length of the
>> intake manifold won't
>> allow you to shim the cyls very much, if at all.
>>   I'm sending you my spreadsheet in a pmail.
>>   Thanks for the reminder to use later rockers,
>> Marc.
>>
>> Mike B.
>
>
>
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> vintagvw site list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/vintagvw
> 

_______________________________________________
vintagvw site list
[email protected]
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/vintagvw

Reply via email to