On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:28:10PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > Therefore, I'd like to move to a model where we mandate pull > requests for contribution to autotest, virt tests and projects > inside the autotest umbrella. Of course, I don't want you guys to > think I'm shovelling this down your throats, so I'd like to hear if > anybody feels very strongly about it. Also, we could consider > exceptions in cases like:
Hi Lucas, I'm confused. How would you provide feedback on a pull request? So if I wanted to review someone's patches, I assume the new model is: - I pull that person's 'pull request' - review it offline - to provide feedback, I ???? and what if the pull request doesn't work or I integrate it wrong/differently than you? Just trying to understand how the new model would work. Cheers, Don > > * I hate github so much that I can't stand using it and I think you > are all morons for even considering this OMG. > * I can't use github because, I don't know, my company forbids using > web browsers or send any requests to the port 80 or 443, or > whatever. > > So please, let us know what you think. By moving to a single, > concentrated point of review I believe we'll have less development > overhead and generally reduce stress levels of the maintainers. > > Cheers, > > Lucas > > > [1] At least for us, lame people that like web browsers, IDEs and > graphical email clients. I know, we are awful, but maybe you can > bear with us. > > _______________________________________________ > Autotest-kernel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel _______________________________________________ Virt-test-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
