An experiment that shows that entanglement of many photons over large distances can happen
http://planetsave.com/2014/03/28/quantum-entanglement-experiment-proves-non-locality-for-first-time-will-permit-multi-party-quantum-communication/ On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > More... > > First, they teleported photons, then atoms and ions. Now one physicist has > worked out how to do it with energy, a technique that has profound > implications for the future of physics. > > > > In 1993, Charlie Bennett at IBM’s Watson Research Center in New York State > and a few pals showed how to transmit quantum information from one point in > space to another without traversing the intervening space. > > The technique relies on the strange quantum phenomenon called > entanglement, in which two particles share the same existence. This deep > connection means that a measurement on one particle immediately influences > the other, even though they are light-years apart. Bennett and company > worked out how to exploit this to send information. (The influence between > the particles may be immediate, but the process does not violate relativity > because some informatiom has to be sent classically at the speed of light.) > They called the technique teleportation. > > That’s not really an overstatement of its potential. Since quantum > particles are indistinguishable but for the information they carry, there > is no need to transmit them themselves. A much simpler idea is to send the > information they contain instead and ensure that there is a ready supply of > particles at the other end to take on their identity. Since then, > physicists have used these ideas to actually teleport photons, atoms, and > ions. And it’s not too hard to imagine that molecules and perhaps even > viruses could be teleported in the not-too-distant future. > > But Masahiro Hotta at Tohoku University in Japan has come up with a much > more exotic idea. Why not use the same quantum principles to teleport > energy? > > Today, building on a number of papers published in the last year, Hotta > outlines his idea and its implications. The process of teleportation > involves making a measurement on each one an entangled pair of particles. > He points out that the measurement on the first particle injects quantum > energy into the system. He then shows that by carefully choosing the > measurement to do on the second particle, it is possible to extract the > original energy. > > All this is possible because there are always quantum fluctuations in the > energy of any particle. The teleportation process allows you to inject > quantum energy at one point in the universe and then exploit quantum energy > fluctuations to extract it from another point. Of course, the energy of the > system as whole is unchanged. > > He gives the example of a string of entangled ions oscillating back and > forth in an electric field trap, a bit like Newton’s balls. Measuring the > state of the first ion injects energy into the system in the form of a > phonon, a quantum of oscillation. Hotta says that performing the right kind > of measurement on the last ion extracts this energy. Since this can be done > at the speed of light (in principle), the phonon doesn’t travel across the > intermediate ions so there is no heating of these ions. The energy has been > transmitted without traveling across the intervening space. That’s > teleportation. > > Just how we might exploit the ability to teleport energy isn’t clear yet. > Post your suggestions in the comments section if you have any. > > But the really exciting stuff is the implications this has for the > foundations of physics. Hotta says that his approach gives physicists a way > of exploring the relationship between quantum information and quantum > energy for the first time. > > There is a growing sense that the properties of the universe are best > described not by the laws that govern matter but by the laws that govern > information. This appears to be true for the quantum world, is certainly > true for special relativity, and is currently being explored for general > relativity. Having a way to handle energy on the same footing may help to > draw these diverse strands together. > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> More,,, >> >> Here is a theory that explains the teleportation of energy via >> entanglement. >> >> >> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2014/jan/27/energy-can-be-teleported-over-long-distances-say-physicists >> >> Energy can be teleported over long distances, say physicists >> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> "especially not without radiation - we must look elsewhere >>> than nuclear." >>> >>> >>> If two atomic structures become entangled, they might be able to share >>> energy between themselves without the production of a gamma ray. If one >>> structure which has undergone a nuclear reaction such as an isotopic shift >>> or a fusion reaction becomes entangled with a receiver, this sender of the >>> energy might send it excess energy to the receiver of that energy. The >>> process of entanglement between the two quantum mechanical structures may >>> allow for an energy transfer in a higher dimension in which entanglement >>> manifests. >>> >>> See >>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0401153.pdf >>> >>> Matter and Light in Flatland >>> >>> I have become intrigued by the internal structure of the photon in >>> higher dimensions. >>> >>> This reference enplanes how electrons an photons must be higher >>> dimensional waveform because they can interfere with themselves in a double >>> stile experiment. >>> >>> A gamma ray can become entangled in a higher dimension with another >>> waveform at a higher dimension and pass energy to the other waveform >>> through an entangled path without our 4 dimensional world knowing it. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> >>>> In reply to David Roberson's message >>>> >>>> >At this point we need to have a long term experiment that exhibits the >>>> same >>>> type of correlations before we can be certain that the process is >>>> nuclear >>>> instead of some unknown chemical effect. You can be confident that the >>>> behavior is nuclear if indications of this type persist for a month. >>>> Perhaps someone would like to calculate how long a chemical cause could >>>> exist that leads to this same observation set to establish a lower limit >>>> upon the time required to prove LENR beyond any doubt. >>>> >>>> > If you look at the Lugano experiment, and assume that all the energy >>>> came >>>> from H, then given the small amount that was present, each atom would >>>> have >>>> to have delivered near 9 MeV of energy. This is out of reach of any >>>> Hydrino >>>> reaction, so the process must have been nuclear, to a very large degree. >>>> >>>> >>>> This conclusion is not logical either, Robin. Since there is also no >>>> known >>>> nuclear reaction involving hydrogen which can provide the amount of >>>> energy >>>> claimed by Levi, especially not without radiation - we must look >>>> elsewhere >>>> than nuclear. >>>> >>>> Either there is another source of energy... or else we cannot trust >>>> what has >>>> been claimed. Clearly the Levi report was flawed, and much less energy >>>> was >>>> involved than what is stated in the report. >>>> >>>> Nevertheless, Watson ... another source of energy is possible - in the >>>> zero >>>> point field. As Sherlock sez: "Once you eliminate the impossible, >>>> whatever >>>> remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." If Levi is >>>> correct on >>>> the 1.5 MW-hrs, then ZPE extraction - which may be improbable, is not >>>> impossible and would be a strong candidate for truth (by the process of >>>> elimination) ... >>>> >>>> ... and BTW - this can bring us back to the Hydrino reaction. It is as >>>> simple as this: >>>> >>>> Premise: there is a previously undescribed mechanism will convert DDL >>>> all >>>> the way back to hydrogen, at the expense of ZPE. Thus the hydrogen that >>>> was >>>> converted to maximum redundancy is "expanded" back, sequentially with >>>> zero >>>> point energy from outside our 3-space. This must happen dozens of times >>>> for >>>> the numbers to add up ... but, according to the experts on zero point, >>>> there >>>> is massive energy available from this avenue. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
