Axil,
               IMHO you could tie this together with anomalous radioactive 
decays and the Shawyer drive.. it would make sense that many of these anomalous 
claims share the same underlying explanation .. I think vacuum density is the 
variable and perhaps degrees of saturation is the tapestry.
Fran

From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 11:03 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Albiston 4/12/2015 Test Demonstrates Excess Power 
Within Core

The uncertainty principle has a feature called a squeezThe uncertainty 
principle has a feature called a squeezed vacuum. When the energy density 
between two or more particles is saturated, a condition called a Squeezed 
coherent state exists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeezed_coherent_state

When the vacuum that encloses  two or more particles becomes saturated, These 
particles share their waveforms through the 5th dimension with out the 4 
dimensional world knowing anything about it so that the particles become 
entangled and equal in energy

Saying this in another way, if two or more particles are enclosed in a strong 
enough magnetic field, they will share energy and become entangled because the 
vacuum is saturated with energy. These multiple particles become essentially 
one particle while the vacuum is saturated.

The energetic vacuum suppresses quantum fluctuations and decoherence is 
disabled. The system becomes entangled with total energy sharing

see

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zD1U1sIPQ4

In more detail, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, is any of a variety of 
mathematical inequalities asserting a fundamental limit to the precision with 
which certain pairs of physical properties of a particle known as complementary 
variables, such as position x and momentum p, can be known simultaneously.

When the energy of the vacuum is high enough, the position of the multiple 
particles become irrelevant in that space, and the particles become the same 
particle. This is when this set of particles share energy.

Reply via email to