More,,, Here is a theory that explains the teleportation of energy via entanglement.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2014/jan/27/energy-can-be-teleported-over-long-distances-say-physicists Energy can be teleported over long distances, say physicists On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > "especially not without radiation - we must look elsewhere > than nuclear." > > > If two atomic structures become entangled, they might be able to share > energy between themselves without the production of a gamma ray. If one > structure which has undergone a nuclear reaction such as an isotopic shift > or a fusion reaction becomes entangled with a receiver, this sender of the > energy might send it excess energy to the receiver of that energy. The > process of entanglement between the two quantum mechanical structures may > allow for an energy transfer in a higher dimension in which entanglement > manifests. > > See > http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0401153.pdf > > Matter and Light in Flatland > > I have become intrigued by the internal structure of the photon in higher > dimensions. > > This reference enplanes how electrons an photons must be higher > dimensional waveform because they can interfere with themselves in a double > stile experiment. > > A gamma ray can become entangled in a higher dimension with another > waveform at a higher dimension and pass energy to the other waveform > through an entangled path without our 4 dimensional world knowing it. > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> >> In reply to David Roberson's message >> >> >At this point we need to have a long term experiment that exhibits the >> same >> type of correlations before we can be certain that the process is nuclear >> instead of some unknown chemical effect. You can be confident that the >> behavior is nuclear if indications of this type persist for a month. >> Perhaps someone would like to calculate how long a chemical cause could >> exist that leads to this same observation set to establish a lower limit >> upon the time required to prove LENR beyond any doubt. >> >> > If you look at the Lugano experiment, and assume that all the energy >> came >> from H, then given the small amount that was present, each atom would have >> to have delivered near 9 MeV of energy. This is out of reach of any >> Hydrino >> reaction, so the process must have been nuclear, to a very large degree. >> >> >> This conclusion is not logical either, Robin. Since there is also no known >> nuclear reaction involving hydrogen which can provide the amount of energy >> claimed by Levi, especially not without radiation - we must look elsewhere >> than nuclear. >> >> Either there is another source of energy... or else we cannot trust what >> has >> been claimed. Clearly the Levi report was flawed, and much less energy was >> involved than what is stated in the report. >> >> Nevertheless, Watson ... another source of energy is possible - in the >> zero >> point field. As Sherlock sez: "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever >> remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." If Levi is correct >> on >> the 1.5 MW-hrs, then ZPE extraction - which may be improbable, is not >> impossible and would be a strong candidate for truth (by the process of >> elimination) ... >> >> ... and BTW - this can bring us back to the Hydrino reaction. It is as >> simple as this: >> >> Premise: there is a previously undescribed mechanism will convert DDL all >> the way back to hydrogen, at the expense of ZPE. Thus the hydrogen that >> was >> converted to maximum redundancy is "expanded" back, sequentially with zero >> point energy from outside our 3-space. This must happen dozens of times >> for >> the numbers to add up ... but, according to the experts on zero point, >> there >> is massive energy available from this avenue. >> >> >> >> >> >> >
