Bosenove were detected in the DGT testing. THis occurs at the end of black hole evaporation. Also, tachyons have been detected inside these micro black holes.
See http://restframe.com/rf/home.html It is well known in string theory, Tachyon condensation produces mesons from which muons a produced as seen by Holmlid. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Frank Znidarsic <[email protected]> wrote: > If we are going to consider small black holes why don't we consider small > supernova explosions. We could even throw in the kitchen sink. > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Roberson <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 4:39 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI > > SPP's are one thing, small black holes another. Why is there any reason > to believe that a black hole is required to initiate LENR reactions? I > suspect that SPP's can do the job without extra help. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 12:15 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI > > During a typical replication run of the Rossi effect, the pressure of the > hydrogen gas goes down over a relatively short timeframe. This might mean > that hydrogen Rydberg matter(HRM) has formed in major part because gas is > transformed into a solid. But the reaction does not take off immediately. > It might be that the energy needed for the HRM to produce heavy SPP > solitons need more time to accumulate. The Rossi reaction may be a two step > process that first forms rydberg matter, then that HRM accumulates energy > in SPPs to form the real cause of LENR: SPP black holes. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Why does it take so long for the Holmlid effect to manifest? >> >> When you have to pump energy into a population of black holes that stores >> huge amounts of energy, it take time and a lot of EMF power to do this. But >> once these solitons are well formed and their power storage threshold is >> reached, they become exquisitely responsive to any additional energy input. >> >> >> This is the reason why the Rossi replicators cannot get a quick response. >> They don't keep at it for long enough. Rossi must cook his fuel for a long >> time to deposit enough energy into those solitons for them to become active. >> >> I believe that application of just heat and laser light is not powerful >> enough EMF stimulation to fill up the energy bucket to the proper level. An >> electric arc might be the best way to pump power into the solitons. >> >> The lessen to take away, use an electric arc to preprocess your fuel. It >> will save a lot of time. >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone else find these just too incredible to believe? >>>> >>> >>> Very much so. I should spend some time looking at the raw data. >>> Holmlid may have something interesting. His interpretation may have >>> sufficiently alienated the people who could help him interpret his results >>> that he may be a little in a bind. Energy conservation considerations >>> point to a misinterpretation of some kind on his part. >>> >>> While these things truly offend my physical sensibilities, having these >>>> nervous concerns also makes me worry that I am becoming a patho-skeptic. >>>> >>> >>> Not at all. What is important is to not write off raw experimental >>> data. Explanations of the data are always fair game. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >> >
