The rotation of polaritons in a vortex produces a ANALOG black hole. Any wave structure in a vortex will produce a black hole even water.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyMYcqxuZ_I On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:55 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > But SPP's can be coaxed into generating enormous magnetic fields. It is > not too difficult to understand that these super fields can interact > strongly with nucleons. Is there reason to believe that magnetic > interaction by SPP's is not going to be adequate? The multiparticle > entanglement theory is not proven to be required for LENR. > > No one has ever captured a small black hole and lived to tell about it! > :-) > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 4:47 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI > > One of the tell tail indications that a black hole is involved is the > cluster fusion mode in LENR reaction. This requires multiparticle > entanglement. Only black holes produce this sort of entanglement(see > ER=ERP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ER%3DEPR). Standard QM entanglement > is monogamous. Only two particles can be entangled. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:38 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> SPP's are one thing, small black holes another. Why is there any reason >> to believe that a black hole is required to initiate LENR reactions? I >> suspect that SPP's can do the job without extra help. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 12:15 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI >> >> During a typical replication run of the Rossi effect, the pressure of the >> hydrogen gas goes down over a relatively short timeframe. This might mean >> that hydrogen Rydberg matter(HRM) has formed in major part because gas is >> transformed into a solid. But the reaction does not take off immediately. >> It might be that the energy needed for the HRM to produce heavy SPP >> solitons need more time to accumulate. The Rossi reaction may be a two step >> process that first forms rydberg matter, then that HRM accumulates energy >> in SPPs to form the real cause of LENR: SPP black holes. >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Why does it take so long for the Holmlid effect to manifest? >>> >>> When you have to pump energy into a population of black holes that >>> stores huge amounts of energy, it take time and a lot of EMF power to do >>> this. But once these solitons are well formed and their power storage >>> threshold is reached, they become exquisitely responsive to any additional >>> energy input. >>> >>> This is the reason why the Rossi replicators cannot get a quick >>> response. They don't keep at it for long enough. Rossi must cook his fuel >>> for a long time to deposit enough energy into those solitons for them to >>> become active. >>> >>> I believe that application of just heat and laser light is not powerful >>> enough EMF stimulation to fill up the energy bucket to the proper level. An >>> electric arc might be the best way to pump power into the solitons. >>> >>> The lessen to take away, use an electric arc to preprocess your fuel. It >>> will save a lot of time. >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Does anyone else find these just too incredible to believe? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Very much so. I should spend some time looking at the raw data. >>>> Holmlid may have something interesting. His interpretation may have >>>> sufficiently alienated the people who could help him interpret his results >>>> that he may be a little in a bind. Energy conservation considerations >>>> point to a misinterpretation of some kind on his part. >>>> >>>> While these things truly offend my physical sensibilities, having these >>>>> nervous concerns also makes me worry that I am becoming a patho-skeptic. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Not at all. What is important is to not write off raw experimental >>>> data. Explanations of the data are always fair game. >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
