Too unclear and this has allowed Krivit to publish his variant of the story- IH- Rossi divorce.
Peter On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Reading between the lines... Does it sound like they're preparing us for >> a negative report on Rossi's one year test? >> > > It does sound that way. > > The statement is oblique, but clearly it is intended to reduce excitement > and dial back people's expectations. > > I think the statement also clearly says: "if you do not hear something > from us, don't believe it." It says that here: > > "That’s why any claims made about technologies in our portfolio should > only be relied upon if affirmed by Industrial Heat . . ." > > > In other words, Rossi does not speak for Industrial Heat. I.H. does not > affirm Rossi's statements on his blog. It probably also means that if Rossi > issues a report which has not been cleared by I.H. and published by them, > they do not affirm it. Meaning endorse it. > > The statement is unclear but I think that part is clear. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
