Yes, and now he's trying to drag Brillouin down with himself and IH. He is claiming that the idea for Brillouin's HHT came from IH. Silliness, since BEC has been working on that idea for years. The difference may be that Brillouin's technology seems more likely to actually work and they are willing to be scientific in their approach. What could have been disclosed beyond what is already in the patent anyway?
*Andrea Rossi* *April 7, 2016 at 8:32 PMHank Mills:They prepared everything, the charges, the body of the reactor EVERYTHING !!!.I just teached to them what to do.They never used anything pre-prepared by Leonardo Corp.Now, let me talk to you of a very singular coincidence: Brillouin has always made only electrolytic apparatuses: go to read all their patent applications made before their agreement with IH, and you will find confirmation of what I am saying ( I know their patents by heart, because I have studied them and probably I know them better than themselves : I wrote about 100 pages of notes about their patents ). And now the singular coincidence: they make the agreement with IH in April 2015, and Voilà, they made a public demo in Capitol Hill ( Washington, DC) with a device that is the Copy-Cat of something I am familiar with. Nothing that Brillouin has ever made before the agreement with IH. What a coincidence !!!Warm Regards,A.R.* On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:25 AM Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Robert Lynn > > Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo > worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track > to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they > would be doing so with a big smile on their face. > > I am glad to see someone recognizing the obvious dynamic in this situation, > whereas the Rossi shills are lost in space, as usual. > > If the device really works, Rossi does not need IH – they are actually a > burden - and the solution is to cancel their license. The lawsuit itself > is an admission that either it does not work, or else the real scam is > that IH is in fact double-dealing with the Chinese. Rossi will not > present well to a jury, and has little chance of succeeding in a trial > unless there is evidence of such a ploy. > > Terry could be right that IH has a secretive plan to bypass Rossi and go > direct to the big market, which is China – but is there any proof of that? > There is no doubt that China needs this far more than anyone else, and > that an e-cat may never be viable in the USA. That could be the big picture > dynamic. > > It just gets curiouser and curiouser…. > > > >
