It will be a simple matter now for Rossi to win in the courts of public opinion and law. He merely has to do what he has always said he was working tirelessly to do – that is to build and deliver working E-Cats. As just one of those E-Cats is seen to be delivered and functioning his legal case will be proven in his favour. If that happens then IH will be revealed for what Rossi says it is and they will want to settle with Rossi out of court and in secret. In such a case it is likely the sum will be far in excess of the $89 million! As for the persistent ‘haters gonna hate’ crowd on the net here and elsewhere I think there is a remarkable business opportunity for someone to publish a great recipe book for 1001 Ways To Cook Crow.
From: Jack Cole [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 8:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to Rossi Yes, and now he's trying to drag Brillouin down with himself and IH. He is claiming that the idea for Brillouin's HHT came from IH. Silliness, since BEC has been working on that idea for years. The difference may be that Brillouin's technology seems more likely to actually work and they are willing to be scientific in their approach. What could have been disclosed beyond what is already in the patent anyway? Andrea Rossi April 7, 2016 at 8:32 PM Hank Mills: They prepared everything, the charges, the body of the reactor EVERYTHING !!!. I just teached to them what to do. They never used anything pre-prepared by Leonardo Corp. Now, let me talk to you of a very singular coincidence: Brillouin has always made only electrolytic apparatuses: go to read all their patent applications made before their agreement with IH, and you will find confirmation of what I am saying ( I know their patents by heart, because I have studied them and probably I know them better than themselves : I wrote about 100 pages of notes about their patents ). And now the singular coincidence: they make the agreement with IH in April 2015, and Voilà, they made a public demo in Capitol Hill ( Washington, DC) with a device that is the Copy-Cat of something I am familiar with. Nothing that Brillouin has ever made before the agreement with IH. What a coincidence !!! Warm Regards, A.R. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:25 AM Jones Beene <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: From: Robert Lynn Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they would be doing so with a big smile on their face. I am glad to see someone recognizing the obvious dynamic in this situation, whereas the Rossi shills are lost in space, as usual. If the device really works, Rossi does not need IH – they are actually a burden - and the solution is to cancel their license. The lawsuit itself is an admission that either it does not work, or else the real scam is that IH is in fact double-dealing with the Chinese. Rossi will not present well to a jury, and has little chance of succeeding in a trial unless there is evidence of such a ploy. Terry could be right that IH has a secretive plan to bypass Rossi and go direct to the big market, which is China – but is there any proof of that? There is no doubt that China needs this far more than anyone else, and that an e-cat may never be viable in the USA. That could be the big picture dynamic. It just gets curiouser and curiouser….
