RE: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to RossiI do not consider it would be good faith to claim OWNERSHIP OF E-CAT IP rather than licensee to use it to provide products in the license domain. IH has had advertised substantial involvement with various entities in China.
The question in my mind is whether or not IH has kept Rossi’s trade secrets of his fuel formula, secret? If IH has not maintained the secret, then I would question the suggestion by Robert Lynn that they are in good faith adherence to the agreement. Rossi raised this issue in his recent complaint. I can imagine that the Chinese entities involved, as well as the Chinese Government, would want to know the fuel parameters that work, and IH, in order to get them onboard, obliged, even though it did “secret sauce” was not a listed IP associated with the agreement. Maybe the actual science of the LENR will remain as cloudy as ever. But as has been suggested, reverse engineering with testing aimed at gaining reasonable understanding involving accepted empirical physical constants, and consistent with a reasonable extension of “current scientific theories” or validated new ones, will happen more readily in China than elsewhere, IMHO. Bob Cook From: Jones Beene Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 7:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to Rossi From: Robert Lynn Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they would be doing so with a big smile on their face. I am glad to see someone recognizing the obvious dynamic in this situation, whereas the Rossi shills are lost in space, as usual. If the device really works, Rossi does not need IH – they are actually a burden - and the solution is to cancel their license. The lawsuit itself is an admission that either it does not work, or else the real scam is that IH is in fact double-dealing with the Chinese. Rossi will not present well to a jury, and has little chance of succeeding in a trial unless there is evidence of such a ploy. Terry could be right that IH has a secretive plan to bypass Rossi and go direct to the big market, which is China – but is there any proof of that? There is no doubt that China needs this far more than anyone else, and that an e-cat may never be viable in the USA. That could be the big picture dynamic. It just gets curiouser and curiouser….
