From: Jack Cole Yes, and now he's trying to drag Brillouin down with himself and IH. He is claiming that the idea for Brillouin's HHT came from IH. Silliness, since BEC has been working on that idea for years. The difference may be that Brillouin's technology seems more likely to actually work and they are willing to be scientific in their approach. What could have been disclosed beyond what is already in the patent anyway?
You are exactly right, Jack … Rossi is clearly wrong about the timing. What a pathological liar the guy is ! He may be able to study patents but can he not read press-releases? SRI was actually testing both Brillouin devices back in 2013 which is a year or two before IH even entered the picture. This is a matter of public record. There is an interview with McKubre somewhere online where he talks about the Brillouin hot version being tested by Tanzella. In contrast there is no valid positive test of any Rossi device after all these years. Of course Rossi is green with jealousy of Brillouin, since they could deliver an independent result at SRI - and he cannot deliver even with his friend Levi as the tester. Andrea Rossi: they make the agreement with IH in April 2015, and Voilà, they made a public demo in Capitol Hill ( Washington, DC) with a device that is the Copy-Cat of something I am familiar with. Nothing that Brillouin has ever made before the agreement with IH. What a coincidence !!! Warm Regards From: Robert Lynn Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they would be doing so with a big smile on their face. I am glad to see someone recognizing the obvious dynamic in this situation, whereas the Rossi shills are lost in space, as usual. If the device really works, Rossi does not need IH – they are actually a burden - and the solution is to cancel their license. The lawsuit itself is an admission that either it does not work, or else the real scam is that IH is in fact double-dealing with the Chinese. Rossi will not present well to a jury, and has little chance of succeeding in a trial unless there is evidence of such a ploy. Terry could be right that IH has a secretive plan to bypass Rossi and go direct to the big market, which is China – but is there any proof of that? There is no doubt that China needs this far more than anyone else, and that an e-cat may never be viable in the USA. That could be the big picture dynamic. It just gets curiouser and curiouser….
