Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As to the supposed ERV 2 we have seen no proof it exists. In fact the > first we hear of it is from Jed, who then starts to back-pedal quite a bit > about it. > I am not back pedaling about anything! This is nonsense. I never meant to say there is an official second report. I said the lawsuit filing lists 3 people involved. One of them works for I.H. I.H. strongly disagrees with the ERV report. They made that clear in their March 10 statement and in their response to the lawsuit. The Penon report claims the device produces 80 times input. That is what Rossi said in his lawsuit. I.H. emphatically denies that. Obviously their experts reached a different conclusion, as you see from their press releases. You do not need me to tell you that. Why is any of what I just said controversial? You can read the press reports and see for yourself I am right. You know darn well what I mean. You may be convinced that Rossi is correct and IH is wrong. But you have no business saying that I am back pedaling or that I have no reason to say what I just said. In my opinion, anyone who thinks that Rossi is better at doing calorimetry than the experts at I.H. does not know either party. There has to be a drastic mistake here and I am sure Rossi is the one who made it, since he is prone to dangerous, stupid, sloppy mistakes, such as the one that almost killed the NASA people. I also stand by my opinion of Penon, based on his 2012 report. He is a certified idiot. Read the report and decide for yourself, but don't tell me I have no basis for my opinion. - Jed
