Hi all In reply to Jed
"... as I said. I.H. says they disagree with the report. They say there is no heat. That makes the report valueless. I trust I.H.'s expertise in calorimetry more than I trust Penon's." 1) Who at I.H. said this? 2) Who is the expert at IH on Calorimetry that you trust so much, that you accept their credentials? 3) How did this "expert" physically perform their tests? 4) How many days of the Test running did they have access to the plant? 5) When did they decide that according to their calorimetry that the plant was not working? 6) What are their qualifications? 7) Can you point me to a nuclear plant they worked on? 8) Can you point me to a report on LENR they have done in the past? Just the beginning of questioning your assertions. Kind Regards walker On 14 April 2016 at 16:34, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On another point; and by way of admonishment. If you are going to report >> something in the future state the source and quote what they say, otherwise >> you will find yourself entrapped again and once again having to back-pedal >> the fantasy. >> > > EVERY DAMN THING I SAID can be confirmed in the press releases and legal > filing. I pointed to these sources again, and again and again. > > LOOK HERE Ian!!! You are free to disagree with me. You can say that in > your opinion I have misinterpreted the press releases, or I do not > understand what the legal papers said about the 3 people who made the > evaluation. You can say that for thus and such reason, you think Rossi is > right that the machine is producing 80 times input, and the I.H. experts > must be wrong. That would all be fine. But DO NOT accuse me of hiding my > sources of information when I have repeatedly listed them here. That is > rude and it is against the rules. It is damned annoying. > > I don't mind being told I am wrong, but I resent it when you ignore what I > say, and accuse me of saying things I did not say, and doing things I did > not do. Stick to the facts, please. > > - Jed > >
