On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Confirm, comment on , or deny this statement... > > During summer 2015, IH offered Rossi to back out from the test and cancel > it, with a significant sum of money as compensation. Rossi’s counter offer > was to give back the already paid 11.5M and cancel the license agreement, > but IH didn’t accept. > > > As I stated previously, I have no knowledge of the business arrangements, contracts and so on between I.H. and Rossi. I would never ask about these matters because they are none of my business. Even if I did know about them, I would never discuss them here, or anywhere else. The only thing I know about is the calorimetry. That is, the equipment and methods used in this test. I have some knowledge of that, although I would like to know more. I know enough to evaluate the claims. Based on my evaluation, I agree with I.H. that there is no excess heat. If you are trying to evaluate calorimetry based on your speculation about business arrangements -- arrangements about which you know nothing -- you are making a huge mistake. - Jed
