Jed,
Heat is heat. It makes no difference if the heat
(water/steam) was used to make chemicals or
whether it was used to heat the air in the room
next door. To say it has to produce some form of
physical process (although just heating air is
considered work) is irrelevant and wrong.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 12:17 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Robert Dorr <<mailto:rod...@comcast.net>rod...@comcast.net> wrote:
Â
Why would it matter what the person using the
heat does with it. All you should be concerned
with is the temperature of the out flowing
fluid/steam and it's rate of flow and the
temperature of the incoming water and it's rate of flow. . . .
You are joking. That has to be joke. No? You mean it??
It matters because seeing the equipment would
prove there really is 1 MW of process heat being
used. You could look at the nameplate of the
equipment and see the capacity. You could watch
the process. You could see that dozens of people
are using the equipment night and day, 7 days a
week. Because if they are not using all the
heat, all the time, the heat returns to reactor,
and the calorimetry is invalid. Or the reactor explodes.
It matters because it is quite impossible to fit
industrial equipment using this much process
heat into a 6,500 sq. ft. facility, and the
claim itself is prima facie proof of fraud. It is preposterous.
If by some miracle you find this equipment
there, in use, and running at a production level
that consumes 1 MW, you would also observe
ventilation equipment and other proof of this heat release.
Okay?
- Jed
