Heat removal was performed convection and by fan driven air circulation of heat through openings in the roof of the plant.
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In order to meet the 1 MW requirement for heat production, the heat >> transferred to the customer must have been constant without much >> variation...in other words, a constant heat sink. The customer must have >> used the heat need it or not in their manufacturing process. >> > > In real life, at a real factory, they turn off the boiler when production > is shut down. What you are saying is that for some strange reason they > decided to leave the boiler running. In that case there must be ventilation > equipment running when they do not need the heat. > > Any person evaluating this claim would have to examine both the production > equipment and the ventilation equipment. You would not rely on calorimetry > alone; you would use every method available to confirm the claim. No one > would pay $89 million without doing this. Rossi and Penon stated this is > not necessary. You saw that in the Lewan interview. such ludicrous > assertions are why I think those two must be very stupid, or they are > frauds. > > - Jed > >
