I would hope that you could be convinced that Rossi is telling the truth if he were to present a solid scientific proof to that fact. Is that not giving him the benefit of the doubt? Can anyone be 100% confident that he is completely lying?
As long as there is any question about the facts, we should be able to explore the complexities of the experiment. So far, it appears that most of the folks with great reservations believe that the water flow rate measurements are where he confuses us the most. I am attempting to follow up on that lead and determine whether or not it is based upon scientific fact. If we can not convince ourselves that this is the source of the error, then we are coming up short. I would hope that you, me and the others can actually figure out why the experiment is not indicative of reality. Let's not become pseudo skeptics unless the data leads to that conclusion. Also, no one should assume that I believe most of what Rossi is saying because I harbor many serious concerns. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Aug 8, 2016 9:11 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter described in court document On 08/08/2016 08:27 PM, David Roberson wrote: I suppose that Rossi may not be telling the truth as you have concluded, but I am attempting to give him the benefit of the doubt. You have got to be kidding. We have been discussing Rossi in this group for the last six years. The first Vortex email I have regarding Rossi is from March, 2010. It's from Jed, and it's quite positive. The road from initial elation with Rossi's fabulous results to the conclusion that it's all just a fable with nothing to back it up was long, contentious, and littered with a lot of dubious claims (from Rossi) and difficult to unearth facts (about what he was really doing). The "benefit of the doubt" ran out long ago for this guy.
