Vorts— Rossi seemed to like an item about WHIMPS brought to his attention on his blog. It seems WHIMP advocates are having a hard time finding any.
The Sci Am editor seems to think dark matter theories may entail “fringe science”. Maybe hydrinos? Mills claims to have some data that are consistent with dark matter characteristics as they may be. I would think that’s better data than the real scientists have in their records. I wonder why Sci Am did not mention Mill’s data? One may need to read between the lines. Bob Cook Its an item from Sci Am last summer. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: mix...@bigpond.com Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclearspallation and resonance In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:50:44 -0800: Hi Russ, [snip] >Mischugenons however unlike 'hydrinos' do produce irrefutable isotopic >shifts in recipient nuclei, During Hydrino fusion, two things can happen:- 1) A proton fuses with the target nucleus, resulting in a change of element. or 2) A proton & an electron fuse concurrently with the target nucleus resulting in an isotope shift in the original element, since essentially they combine to create a new neutron. This is enhanced electron capture. Enhanced, because the electron is severely shrunken, making it much easier to capture than a normal atomic electron. >though the quantity of shifted isotopes is much >lower lower or higher? >than the apparent mischugenon flux as measured/inferred by the >resulting weak emissions! Perhaps a 'third' miracle is needed, oh shit, will >it ever all be revealed. > >-----Original Message----- >From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear >spallation and resonance > >In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:53:41 -0800: >Hi Russ, >[snip] >>Agreed that is the second miracle required! But is there any standing >>reported evidence for strange mishugenonistic neutron resonance, aka >>reflected neutrons, that subsequently behave in a manner effecting the >>lack of 'energetic gamma'-less absorbing of neutrons save perhaps >>invoking quasi-dark matter-like behavior, nah... ;) Perhaps said >>resonant conditioned mischugenon/neutrons would behave somewhat like >>normal neutrons and be captured preferentially by nuclei according to >>their neutron capture cross-section resulting in only rather weak >>emissions. Such beasties would be revealed by the pattern of measurable >>though weak emissions increasing as they passed through thin foils of >>metals with increasing neutron capture cross sections, I can live with that >:) That's a neat experiment and result! >>http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2013/05/04/edward-teller/ > >Are you the "I" in this tale? > >As for "mischugenons" they sound a lot like well shrunken Hydrinos. Not as >small as neutrons, so they penetrate the electron shells of atoms less >easily, and need to tunnel into the target nucleus, reducing the reaction >rate. When they merge with a target nucleus, the resultant energy can be >carried by the accompanying electron, or by the other proton if the initial >particle was a Hydrino molecule. The latter possibility in particular might >account for a considerable reduction in emitted gammas (by many orders of >magnitude). > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
