You are right about the testing, particularly the state of the steam
that is generated and we hope that should be rectified soon.
There are a couple of indications that strongly suggest that the steam
is pretty dry. If you look at stills from the slow motion system, when
the steam initially emerges it is totally transparent. You can see that
is is there because it refracts the light passing through it so that
objects in the background are shifted quite considerably. A couple of
frames later and it has condensed out into the visible cloud.
Also, the steam can only exit the cavitation chamber through the
pressure relief valve when the pressure exceeds 10MPa. From steam
tables this means that it must be at a temperature of more than 300C.
However, this is too indirect an indication, and as I said we hope to
rectify this soon.
On 28/09/2017 15:37, JonesBeene wrote:
Having talked to another visitor to the facility, it would seem that
the main problem with the technology using pure water is in
measurement- and curiously it is almost the same as Rossi’s early
errors -wet steam. They definitely can produce lots of wet steam and
generally they have assumed that all of the water going through the
injector is being converted into dry steam - when in fact only a
fraction is dry steam and the rest is hot water vapor. This could be
why you see no independent testing.
The salt water system is more impressive but again, no good data. The
salt-water gain seems impressive visually. I believe it is a true
energy anomaly, but getting rid of the salt after the reaction is
over- probably means that the system cannot be used in a piston engine
(using salt water as a fuel). This is due to corrosion and
accumulation on piston rings -- but there could be a solution. Same
problem with the injectors – a month of slat water and what do you have?