I am aware of these tidbits. But,Language is mechanical and have universal rules that are quite strict.If you feed it with massive quantities of data, it will eventually get it right: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example-based_machine_translation . It can be seen here an example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_grammar . And, as I mentioned, as times go, examples of very narrow problems accumulate, which gives an impression of advance. But, all that is achieved because, even if something is superficially very subjective, it has rules. There is no understanding of a text or a context, even if the translation is correct. That's because grammar rules are strict. That is the same with poker and go.
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Che
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. H LV
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Che
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- RE: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Chris Zell
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Alain Sepeda
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Alain Sepeda
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Adrian Ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Adrian Ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Adrian Ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers. Daniel Rocha

