Jed, I have never stated nor thought that everything Rossi has said or done
should be accepted without question. So you are making that up.
I think there is significant evidence that some of his E-Cats worked &
suggested several times it would be better to wait and see than dismiss
everything with the certainty that you do.
Why do you think he is building a factory? As I reported elsewhere there is
evidence that he is doing so.
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
To: Vortex <email@example.com>
Sent: Thu, Jan 25, 2018 1:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries
Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
Jed, I find your comment rather ironic considering your dismissal of
everything that Rossi has done.
You imply that I must accept all new claims without question. That would be as
irrational as rejecting all of them out of hand.
You imply that I am not capable of evaluating claims. If I can read McKubre and
conclude that he is right, I can read the Penon report and conclude that Rossi
The suggestion that a person who uses ordinary judgment and evaluates claim is
somehow "ironic" is a new definition of irony.
Actually, I cannot imagine how a technically competent person could read the
Penon report and not conclude that Rossi was wrong. Axil Axil and other Rossi
supporters have finessed this problem by refusing to read the report. Robert
Park used the same technique to reject all cold fusion results -- he refused to
look at them. That's ironic!