Jürg -- I see you have been refining these ideas over several years
https://www.researchgate.net/project/Nuclear-and-particle-physics-20
Nice body of work !
Let's hope that your experiments are able to validate the model.
Jones
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
Yes! The 4-He spin pairing energy can be directly derived from the SO(4)
electro-weak potential force. Also the missing correction of the Hydrogen (p-e)
ionization energy can be given by the very same force and the SO(4) orbits. If
you did follow the SO(4) physics, then you can see that with SO(4) orbits you
get all known 10 digits of the ionization energy. (Deuterium too!)
In the last year I found 3 different ways to model the nuclear energies (mass).
First standards constants based, second magnetic mass based, third: coupled
orbit based (includes second model). The last model gives the exact masses &
"magnetic mass" structure for neutron, deuterium, 4-He.
My focus on theory is currently very low. I'm doing LENR experimental support
and I'm "glad" to see that the new model(s) works as expected.
As soon as others catch up (understand) with SO(4) physics I will start to
model again. The SO(4) model is safe enough as it exactly explains the
gravitation constant without any work around and fitting just using basics
SO(4) physics quantities, that were derived long before the formula has been
found...
If you understand the SO(4) based nature of gravitation you will start to like
the new model! All mass is spin-base!
Jürg
Am 04.05.2019 um 00:48 schrieb Jones Beene:
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> In contrast to QM SO(4) physics gives the exact relation of forces/energies
of spin-paired electrons, what is the first step of condensation of matter
below Bohr radius.
Hi,
If you have a minute - what is the exact relation that you mention? Is there
a known binding energy for spin-paired electrons that is supported by this
theory ?
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
