From: Andrew Meulenberg
➢ A possible weakness in the ICCF-14 model is the assumption that the increased effective mass of a lattice electron would be valid for atomic-hydrogen spacings (dimensions) below that of the lattice. Andrew, There is an interesting and possibly unplanned convergence of your thinking with that of Jürg Wyttenbach relative to electron effective mass and spin… which curiously also turns up at the basis of “spintronics”. Perhaps LENR will move in that direction. After all, the “effective mass” of electrons is a well studied detail in that context. In the case of Holmlid -- and taken to the extreme (far extreme) - the large change in electron "effective mass" which can be engineered in spintronics may point to the origin of what Holmlid detects as “muons”. After all, the strongest objection to his work is the actual annihilation of hydrogen, supposedly into muons. It may not be completely out of the question to suggest that he is somehow seeing the scattering of transitory remnants from massively increased (effective mass), rather than annihilation.
