Jones, In answer to your question about the "known binding energy for spin-paired electrons," KP Sinha and I have some theoretical papers that provide some information that would support the application of spin-paired electrons to CF. KP's early work on the pair includes published references to them and KP coined the phrase for the pair as a local-charged boson (the Lochon) that can be found in [K. P. Sinha, Infinite Energy 29, 54 (2000)]. An extension of this model is in:
K. P. Sinha and A. Meulenberg, “A Model for Enhanced Fusion Reaction in a Solid Matrix of Metal Deuterides,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF-14) 10-15 August 2008 Washington DC p. 633, http://coldfusioncommunity.net/pdf/conf/ICCF-14/633_ICCF-14.pdf These papers were prior to our deep-orbit electron models, but the concept can still be useful in helping to get electrons into those deep orbits. A possible weakness in the ICCF-14 model is the assumption that the increased effective mass of a lattice electron would be valid for atomic-hydrogen spacings (dimensions) below that of the lattice. However, the assumption that the hydrogen would be in a linear sub-lattice, which could "shrink", lent some credence to that assumption. This later led to a model of a lattice-bound, linear-H, molecule being an option for populating the deep-electron orbits and producing CF: A. Meulenberg, K.P. Sinha, “Composite model for LENR in linear defects of a lattice,” ICCF-18, 18th Int. Conf. on Cond. Matter Nuclear Science, Columbia, Missouri, 25/07/2013, Abstract and presentation slides at http://hdl.handle.net/10355/36818, video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcTSUJUCRHE Andrew _ _ _ On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 6:49 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > > In contrast to QM SO(4) physics gives the exact relation of > forces/energies of spin-paired electrons, what is the first step of > condensation of matter below Bohr radius. > > Hi, > If you have a minute - what is the exact relation that you mention? Is > there a known binding energy for spin-paired electrons that is supported by > this theory ? > >
