On Sat, 23 May 2009, Terry Blanton wrote:

> http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/04/does-dna-have-t.html
>
> Does DNA Have Telepathic Properties?

Terry, there's also a "DNA Telepathy" announcement from two or three years
back, where two portions of DNA crystal were found to have identical
segments via fluorescent tagging ...even though they were on either side
of a membrane, and separated by many nanometers.  Someone here at the UW
published a paper on it.  Search on "dna telepathy" for old hits? Here's
one http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080124103151.htm


Also, there's an enormous unsolved problem in biology which is similar to
this 'telepathy' problem, yet nobody talks about it:
  In living cells, how to "keys" and "locks" almost instantly find each
  other over vast distances, and how can they do it in an environment
  where organized water behaves as a solid at the micro-level?

This problem becomes very obvious in the famous Harvard animation of the
workings of a cell,   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZZ3DD_tV9k
http://multimedia.mcb.harvard.edu/media.html

Watch ribosomes come flying in from a distance, then somehow finding and
docking to a pore on the nucleus membrane.  What attracts them to the
membrane?  How to they find the pore itself?  Wouldn't there have to be
some kind of weird, "key-lock" attractive force that pulls that particular
pore-type protein to that particular ribosome-type protein?

And next, immediately the film shows another mystery, where the tip of a
nucleus RNA comes flying up from below, docks with the pore/ribosome
assembly, and starts "running the tape" to assemble a protein.  Why was
the tip of the RNA strand attracted to the nuclear membrane?  How could
it seek out the membrane pore?   (Stupid hint, grin: imagine that the
video takes place in total darkness, so the molecules can't see where to go!)

In other parts of the film, the animators didn't solve the mystery by
illustrating unknown forces which nobody talks about.  Instead they did it
by cheating.  When a fiber of actin or tubulin assembles itself, the
animators simply created a film of these fibers dissolving, with all the
broken parts diffusing away.  THEN THEY RAN THE FILM BACKWARDS!  It's a
total violation of 3rd law entropy, with time running backwards.
Molecules come flying in from vast distances and link onto the growing
fiber tip.  What force drives this amazing phenomenon? More importantly,
what forces select the proper type of molecule subunit, and only attracts
that type of molecule towards the growing end of the fiber?  What
mechanism can make it seem that time can run backwards, to assemble
subcellular fibers?

Nobody knows.

Long ago it was explained by diffusion.  But then calculations showed that
diffusion took too much time.   Then years later the discovery of solid
"organized intracellular water" made the problem even more inexplicable.

I suspect that the real problem is psychological:

   Since we KNOW that cellular biology has nearly all problems solved, and
   no huge revolutions in biological science happen anymore, therefore
   it's impossible that any "vast unknown" could still exist.  (If it did,
   it would make our contemporary science look ignorant and primitive,
   like something from last century! )  So, there's really nothing left to
   explore, at least nothing big.  We're only cleaning up the details,
   such as the protein-folding mystery.

And so, if an entire community of smart and highly trained people looks
directly at an enormous unsolved problem ...they won't see it.  They're
selectively blind. And it's not even the complicated problems that they
miss.  It's the obvious ones that even little kids would point out.
"Daddy, why does the continent of Africa fit onto south America like two
pieces of a puzzle? Mommy, why does that animation of molecules look like
time is running backwards?"  If mommy is a cell biologist, then...
"shut up kid, you aren't smart enough to understand."  But the little kid
is right.


> DNA has been found to have a bizarre ability to put itself together,
> even at a distance, when according to known science it shouldn't be
> able to. Explanation: None, at least not yet.

What's realy amazing: your news item causes a stir, when most of the
simplest cellular processes require that the molecules somehow must be
attracted together over a distance, as if keys and locks with matching
"codes: can sense each other.

> Scientists are reporting evidence that contrary to our current beliefs
> about what is possible, intact double-stranded DNA has the “amazing”
> ability to recognize similarities in other DNA strands from a
> distance.

When ribosomes are assembling proteins, and the little tRNA's are bringing
in the subunits to join the growing strand ...how does the ribosome pull
in those particular building-blocks from vast distances?  Whatever this
mystery-force may be, it's enormously strong, since proteins are assembled
at kilohertz rate.

[sarcasm]Or maybe it's magical reverse diffusion, where the arrow of time
is going backwards.  A completed protein, in the future, is "living
bckwards," and as it dissolves, it appears to us that it's assembling
itself.  Problem solved.[/sarcasm]

> Somehow they are able to identify one another, and the tiny
> bits of genetic material tend to congregate with similar DNA.

In actin fiber growth, somehow the subunits are able to identify the fiber
tip, and seek it out over quite enormous distance.  In tubulin growth,
somehow the tubulin molecules are able to identify the fiber tip, and seek
it out.  In protein assembly, somehow the tRNA "ferryboats" are able to
identify the active ribosome, and bring the needed subunits to the
fast-growing protein tip.  In communication across the nuclear membrane,
somehow RNA tips are able to identify nucleus membrane pores, and travel
across vast distances to dock with, then pass through the pore.  (SHort
list.  Many more examples exist, just watch that video while keeping
your eyes peeled.)


> The “telepathic” effect is a source of wonder and amazement for
> scientists.

Everyone go watch:

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZZ3DD_tV9k
  http://multimedia.mcb.harvard.edu/media.html


(((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                            SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com                         http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA  206-762-3818    unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci

Reply via email to