Mauro,
I converted my power point presentation on fractional
quantum states to html. I think it has bearing on your additional axis from
a relativistic perspective http://www.byzipp.com/energy/excessHeat.htm
Regards
Fran
From: Mauro Lacy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 8:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Casimir force at slab edges
Mauro Lacy wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Mauro Lacy
Please take into account that when Hotson says 'imaginary direction' you
can read '4th spatial dimension'.
Are you familiar with the Dirac concept of "reciprocal space"?
No, but I'll read about it. Reciprocal space sounds like a mirror space to
me. By example, using the fourth dimension, you can invert a tridimensional
sphere without breaking it. That is, you can put the inside out and
viceversa, through a rotation over a fourth dimensional space, in the same
way as you can invert a bidimensional figure by rotating it in a three
dimensional space. Reciprocal space then can be
Just for clarity: How it'll look like? Tridimensionally, you'll see that the
sphere starts shrinking, until becoming a point, and then starts growing
again, but this time the inside is outside, and viceversa. It has inverted,
like you can invert a glove. Suppose initially the sphere is painted blue in
the inside, and red on the outside. After the fourth dimensional rotation,
you'll get a blue sphere with a red interior.
That's a fourth dimensional (semi) rotation. And that can be probably
understood as "reciprocal spaces". A full rotation will bring you the
original sphere again.
Mauro
understood as the mirror image of a n-dimensional space, rotated in one
higher (n+1) dimensional space.
... or rather, like so many things that have been updated in order to bring
Dirac into the 21st Century, are you familiar with how this conception can
be reconciled with a '4th spatial dimension'? (even if others have rejected
that as a possible implication)
No, I'm not familiar with that at all(although I would read about it as soon
as possible). Anyways, see above for a possible method of reconciliation or
equivalence between these concepts.
Mauro
