To reiterate, the cheap trick I referred to was removing the bottom
of the graph (the zero line) and the numbers from the axes. Krivit
says that was "simplified so people can get the larger picture." It
doesn't look simplified to me but anyway, don't ever do that, for any reason.
That's what I objected to. I had nothing to say regarding the content
of the graphs. I have nothing to say about this latest stuff about
McKubre and Hagelstein misrepresenting "predicted values" and the
other horseshit in Krivit's message. It is beneath contempt.
- Jed
