Friends, I object to the heavy Krivit bashing, it is not called for, even if the evidence for the 24MeV heat/He was solid enough which I don't think it is. And he is free to present his graphs as he pleases in his slides, especially if he directs the reader to a more complete graph elsewhere.
In fact, I was wondering, who cares about the heat, helium production alone is an indisputable proof of LENRs, isn't it? Michel 2010/3/31 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > >> I don't agree with Rothwell that a truncated graph is never acceptable, >> but using it to create an exaggerated impression is indeed reprehensible. > > If you truncate the graph, you should say so: "graph is truncated from > original." Also, never remove the numbers from the axes. > > Even if you do not intend to create an exaggerated impression, people like > me will assume that is your intention. You have made a naive mistake. So > don't do it without a good reason, and state your reason. > > - Jed > >
