the larger picture being, "what we want them to think" On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > To reiterate, the cheap trick I referred to was removing the bottom of the > graph (the zero line) and the numbers from the axes. Krivit says that was > "simplified so people can get the larger picture." It doesn't look > simplified to me but anyway, don't ever do that, for any reason. > > That's what I objected to. I had nothing to say regarding the content of the > graphs. I have nothing to say about this latest stuff about McKubre and > Hagelstein misrepresenting "predicted values" and the other horseshit in > Krivit's message. It is beneath contempt. > > - Jed >
- [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying trick Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying trick Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying tric... Alexander Hollins
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying trick Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying tric... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying ... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoy... Michel Jullian
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his ... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on ... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his ... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his ... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on ... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

