I don't recall Naudin's specific error and I don't have time to look at what

his site now claims. However, the error was quite obvious. I think it was
that 
Naudin used  (P*V)*(P*I) to calculate power thus introducing an extra 
factor of P and explaining the OU proportional to 1/P.

George Holz 
Varitronics Systems
[email protected]


Reply via email to