-----Original Message----- From: Stephen A. Lawrence > That's certainly true -- it looks suspicious. But again, it's not conclusive, and it doesn't point to any specific error.
Thinking back on it, there was never a "smoking gun" or specific error IIRC, but the most convincing thing now, in retrospect, is that the group which would benefit the most (Moller) has dropped all reference to the high number. In my book that is tantamount to an admission. The more troubling thing is that there is almost nothing new to be found on the furtherance on this project in the last couple of years. Is it dead for Naudin and Moller ? It seemed likely at the time that Alexander Frolov (Faraday Lab Ltd) would move forward with it, since he had the original device constructed with help from the famous Svetlana Vacuum Tube company of St. Petersburg, Russia. The tube was identical to one of their water cooled 100,000 watt RF amplifier tubes with the exception of the tungsten sputtering to the inside of it. Given the results and theory of Mills, and what can be gleaned from Arata / Rossi / Focardi etc, etc - one can only wish that they had used a nickel-Pd alloy instead of tungsten for the sputtering. Jones
