In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Sun, 1 May 2011 20:10:49 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Robin, >I respectfully disagree... >I think the 'norm' is that the different forces do NOT interact, unless under >extreme or unusual or >specific conditions. I.e., for chemistry (electron-level interactions) and >nuclear interactions, >the ZPE is pretty much a non-player. > >But then, wasn't it Puthoff who suggested that the reason the electron doesn't >collapse into the >nucleus is due to ZPE? > >-Mark
I think that if the ZPE exists, then it is responsible for all other forces. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 3:46 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about the Rossi CATALYST? > >In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Sun, 1 May 2011 13:37:54 -0700: >Hi, >[snip] >>And if one considers ZPE interactions then one might have to ignore the >>COE since we have no way of measuring ZPE! Testing COE requires that >>ALL energy inputs and outputs, of ANY kind, must be measurable. > >Note that if ZPE exists, then it has always existed and interacted with every >experiment ever done. >IOW the conservation laws were developed in an environment in which the ZPE >existed, so one might >expect that it's effects are already "built in", except perhaps under >extremely exceptional >circumstances. Those circumstances would need to be determined if one expects >an exception in this >case. >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
