At 08:58 AM 8/5/2011, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Galantini said that reads grams of liquid water
/ m^3 of vapor on display of HD37AB1347.
From Leviâs report, Galantini used an
HP474ACR probe, that measure RH and temperature.
In the 2nd email, Galantini claim that he
measured the preassure inside the e-cat. Nobody
know how he measured, since HD37AB1347
instruments CANNOT measure preassure, but only
*atmospheric preassure*, with strict temperature
range (-20,+60, see manual). Beyond these
ranges, nobody know if the instrument works well.
Rizzi is quite correct, it appears. The device
has a pressure sensor in it, the pressure sensor
is not in the probe. It's looking like Galantini
assumed he was getting a pressure reading from
the probe he'd placed in the E-cat, hence his error.
The man had no clue. He should have been suspicious.
These people had no idea how much pressure would
be generated inside the E-cat from a few grams of
steam per second being generated! "At ambient"
was just plain preposterous nonsense, unless there was *no* steam.
But why would we expect a chemist to be an expert on steam?
Why? Well, if we were Rossi and wanted to snooker
some "expert" into validating his claims, we might indeed choose a chemist.
