2011/8/5 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]>: > The device has a pressure sensor in it, > the pressure sensor is not in the probe. It's looking like Galantini assumed > he was getting a pressure reading from the probe he'd placed in the E-cat, > hence his error. >
This is too simple explanation! Rossi arranged perfectly open and transparent demonstration, but he just hired unimaginably stupid scientists, such as Galantini and Kullander who failed with such a basic laboratory routines as calibrating thermometer. All measurements what was needed to do was, to weight the inflow water rate, measure the temperature inside E-Cat and examine the diameter of opening for the water/steam outlet hose. With these figures it is possible to calculate rather accurately what is the real heating power of E-Cat. But no, they failed to calibrate thermometer and since it's absolute accuracy without calibration is something like ±0.5°C, temperature figure is more less useless! Luckily Mats Lewan was smart enough scientist and we can at least _assume_, that the same thermometer was used in all demonstrations. - Jouni Ps. Abd ul-Rahman, be careful when insulting chemists. I'm (bio-)chemist too and I know everything about the steam, since I have cooked pasta when I was 12-years old. And also physical chemistry covers rather well all that are related to thermodynamics.
