Am 01.09.2011 20:12, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com
<mailto:jounivalko...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Horace wrote: «I would note that steam sparging can have large
errors due to steam escaping, due to variability in measuring the
temperature decline curve, due to variations in the calorimetry
constant with temperature, and due to imperfect stirring techniques.»
Yes it is easy to do errors in the magnitude of procent.
In this case, with this large power gain, an error of 30% is completely
acceptable, and if there is a tradeoff between precision and
reliability and evidency then the 30% error method should be used. Then
the measurement is trivial and highly evident if made by trained
scientists and documented and witnessed.
It is not necessarry in this stage of development to measure exactly the
amout of energy.
It is necessary to show with scientific evidency that more energy is
produced than consumed. If we have this proof, then everything else can
follow as the waggons follow a locomotive.
Not an equation must be proven, its an un-equation A > B that mut be
proven (this is trivial) and it must be shown that no tricks are used
(this is non-trivial)
