Jed, I hate to ask, really. You seem to be impressed by that graph. If you look closely at the Ny Teknik results, the output at the heat exchanger doesn't seem to track the logged E-Cat temperatures in any meaningful way. A quick example is between 19:03 and 19:22: In that time frame, E-Cat temp is steadily decreasing, hydrogen is purged, the frequency generator is turned off, and water flow increased (in the primary). But in the following 20 minutes, the output supposedly increases from 3.9 kW to 6.1 kW. This doesn't seem to be an issue for you, so I was wondering if you could explain it to the rest of us.
Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: >Joe Catania <[email protected]> wrote: > >** >> No the band heater is at 900C but that metal block talk was only for >> illustrative purposes. Newtons LAw is irrelevant. >> > >Newton's law governs passive heat loss, which is what this has to be if >there is not energy input and the flow rate does change. > > > >> An insulated metal block that loses heat at a rate of 1W loses heat at the >> rate of 1W. You mention lack of monotonicity but what's the example (be >> specific, post link). >> > >Right here: > >http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/304196_10150844451570375_818270374_20774905_1010742682_n.jpg > >The temperature rises several times after the power is turned off. > >- Jed
