I'd say that this Demo has been totaly Rossied. ;) On 11 October 2011 19:02, Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> The data from the September test is great, in this aspect. They did it > right. > They were filling the E-Cat from a reservoir, and after it was boiling, > they gave us the net weight of water in the input reservoir at 21:07, then > logged every time water was added, and provided us a final weight. > > * > > Water flow inlet > > *Added water during start up, from 18:30: 15640 + 9380 + 9473 + 9959 = > 44452 grams. Remaining in the inlet reservoir when the temperature inside > the E-cat reached 100°C at 21:07: 8431 grams. Consumed in 2:37 hours (2.62 > hours): 36021 grams Flow during start-up: 13.76 kg/hour > Added water from 21:07: 8431 + 10089 + 10460 + 6591 + 9960 = 45531 grams. > Remaining in the inlet reservoir at 23:10: 22823 grams. Consumed in 2:03 > hours (2.05 hours): 22708 grams Flow during boiling: 11.08 kg/hour. > Total running time >100°C: 2:05 (2.08) hours > Total flow >100 degrees (from 21:05): 23.0 kg > > IMPORTANT: In the September test, there is no reference to "increasing > flow" at the end, they just turn the pump off. This begs the question if > the September test had the pump running at full capacity. If so, the rate > seen during Septembers operation of 11.08 kg/hr (3.1 g/sec) would be EVEN > LOWER during the October test. We know for a fact that the October test, the > pump was not running at full capacity, because they specifically stated that > the increased the flow during quenching. > > Obviously, the pump does not put out consistent pressure, as seen in the > September test. Was it slowed down for the October test? Was it harder to > push through the heat exchanger, across the floor, under the doormat, then > up into the drain, than the September test? > > If the placement of the thermocouples on the heat exchanger cause us to > throw out that temperature data, and the E-Cat calorimetry is plagued with > phase-change and unknown water flow, just where do we stand? > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:26:43 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi heat exchanger fitting / SOME flow data > From: robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > > Peristaltic pump NSF Model # CEP183-362N3 Serial # 060550065 Max output > 12.0 liters/h Max press 1.50 bar > > > So it was a maximum of 12 l/hr during cool-down, and if we take Lewan's > numbers as a ratio -- 6 l/hr when stable. > > 12l/hr gives a maximum transfer rate of 8.8 kW -- close to the peak 7.6 kW > recorded on the secondary. > > > http://www.lmipumps.com/Files/lmi/Global/US-en/products/1713e.pdf > If you know what the frequency is (the large thumping noise in all the > videos about every second or so) then you can tell what the maximum flow > rate is because the pump is only capable of deliverting 2ml per stroke. >
