Hello Robert Leguillon, a pretty good short summary of Horace Heffner's competent, detailed, much improved critical reviews -- so pragmatic skepticism seems amply justified...
Thanks, Rich Murray On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Robert Leguillon <[email protected]> wrote: > Jed, > Don't miss the fundamental argument of heat storage. > Great care was taken to insulate the E-Cat, and keep heat from escaping. If > you think that this is impossible, I have an experiment for you. Make a > scalding hot 1/2 cup of coffee. Put it into a Thermos. See how long it > takes to cool. > Repeat the experiment with a larger volume of coffee. > People are saying that 20 liters of boiling water in a container > specifically designed to hold heat, surrounding large hunks of metal > exceeding 124C (after all, they must be hotter than the water to heat it) > has stored energy. > Rossi, in one of the videos or his blog (can't remember) said there was > about 20 liters of water. At .91 s/g flow rate, it would take more than 6 > hours to replace the water in the E-Cat. > Think eye-dropper of cold water into a scalding hot pot. > You come across as demeaning when you dismiss these arguments for "violating > the laws of physics." > The only temperature increases that you are seeing are on the secondary, > which necessarily must be incorrect. More than likely, HH is right, and the > changes seen are the results of slugs of hot water overflowing the E-Cat. > The measurements at the secondary MUST BE incorrect. If the measurements > are correct, the E-Cat would run dry and the temperature would have to rise.
