Yes after careful consideration, watching your behavior here and other places, and other sources, and numerous attempts to explain to you the purpose of this forum, which you just choose to ignore, that is my conclusion. If youd care to take an anonymous vote of forum members, I would be happy to comply if the majority dont mind your barrage of redundant postings. Its really a shame too, because you are an intelligent person, but by your own admission, you are not interested in learning anything about LENR that just doesnt fit in here at all. All you choose to do with that intelligence is point out the obvious shortcomings in this ongoing saga, which are, well, obvious! Out of your nearly 800 postings in only a few months, way more than anyone on this forum, you have brought really very little new or insightful information, which I am sure you are very capable of doing. You simply prefer to constantly point out the same suspicions about Rossi and DGT over and over and over again. Several people have left the forum because of your barrage of redundant postings. I bet you feel proud of that, eh?
I received an email many weeks ago from someone describing your behavior on other websites, and after watching your behavior and responses since then, Id have to say that it turned out to be quite accurate. Then the recent postings here which brought to light that youve been banned on numerous other websites, which you wear like a badge and using ways to circumvent the ban. It is pathological to want to do those kinds of things; to force yourself onto groups that have chosen to exclude you. Yes, I think my conclusions are very much supported by the facts. You seem to think that it is ok, even admirable, to impose your opinions where they are not welcome. Why do you need to plaster your suspicions all over the net? Every single place mentioned on this forum about some new article about Rossi or DGT, when I went to that webpage, there you were, sometimes the first to comment! Gotta make sure to spread your suspicions in the comment section; point out all the questionable details, over and over again. Look around, Mary. Youre the ONLY one on this forum who does that pretty much tells me everything I need to know about you. Of all the E-Cat/DGT website articles in the past year, I may have added a comment on one or two, but I have better things to do than spread my opinions all over the net. Id rather spend the time trying to understand the phenomenon, and maybe, by some very small chance, help it gain acceptance. In the past, you and Mr. Hope, and even Mr. Lawrence, have tried to make this look like Im only picking on the skeptic that I dont want to listen to the skeptical side. That is so ridiculous for this reason; I never felt the need to chastise Cude, who is a MUCH stronger and MUCH more effective skeptic than anyone on this list, even you. Why? Simple he sticks to the facts and science, backs up his positions with calculations (and it only takes high school algebra to do most of them, so no excuses), and, it was obvious that he read at least some of the LENR literature and made an effort to become informed about the research; I did learn a thing or two from his contributions. I can respect that even if I disagree with some of his positions; I most certainly disagree with his position that LENR is all just a mistake and hasnt advanced in decades because there is nothing to it. Im sorry to say that after all of your nearly 800 postings, I just dont feel any level of respect for your behavior here well, now that I think of it, there was one thing -- your offer to help conduct a test of the heat exchanger and manifold to which I was most supportive and offered to contribute to the $ side. So you see, I am supportive of skeptical efforts to learn more, *even yours*, when they are in line with the main purpose of the forum. And occasional off-topic stuff and other non-tech postings dont bother me at all its just the constant barrage of stuff that has been hashed over and over that I object to, and nearly all of your postings fall into that category The main purpose of this forum is to discuss, do some testing, and hopefully better understand what might be happening with unusual technologies such as LENR, and if many here seem to cut Rossi/DGT some slack, so be it. Its not because we are gullible or naïve; we have analyzed the demos to death, and are well aware of the issues and concerns. We can look past behaviors and conflicting statements, which PROVE nothing, and say to ourselves that there is a decent chance that they just might have optimized the LENR reaction. That comes from a more informed and knowledgeable background since weve been following and discussing and some even participating in LENR research for *decades*. We have a good idea of just how much research has been done on LENR, and possibly even inside information from people who are generous enough to take time to brief someone on this forum (BTW, if anonymity is good enough for you, then it is for those insiders as well). I think nearly all the regulars here agree that LENR is a real phenomenon, and we would like to try to understand it, and help support bringing it into acceptance for a better world. It seems like anyone would be supportive of that, but your pathological need to constantly voice your concerns about Rossis and DGTs behaviors, their business practices and press releases, and pointing out every little thing that could be considered suspicious, is pretty much useless speculation and of little real value to this forum. If you are so utterly compelled to do that, fine, just do it elsewhere if its so damn important to you oh, youre probably banned from those other sites gee perhaps were just too tolerant here... we certainly have been with your excuse for anonymity. Im sorry that you choose to use your intelligence and time to barrage us with the obvious inconsistencies, warn us, and the whole internet for that matter, about Rossis suspicious behaviors and the poorly done demos. Why not try to help the forum understand the underlying technology? It is a technology, and very likely a scientific discovery, that will be the most important development in our lifetime in *your* lifetime. Think about that, Mary. Given the purpose of this forum, would your kids be proud of the way youve used your intelligence and time to contribute, and just how helpful were those efforts? Sleep well -Mark From: Mary Yugo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 11:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simple, even simple-minded tests can be a great help in understanding these things On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> wrote: Shes an insignificant troll nothing more. Was that a calculated statement? Your behavior is so intelligent and dignified statement, Mark. You should be proud of it and of yourself.
