In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:20:46 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I was assuming time to switch on of about 5 minute, taken from defkalion
>> (most of my computation are from defkalion hyperion)
>>
>
>I do not know whether we should call this "switch on" or "ramp up" but yes,
>this is what I was looking at as well, when I estimated that a cold fusion
>powered car might need about 6 minutes of battery power at maximum speed.
>(One-tenth hour)
>
>When I say "ramp up" I mean I assume the cold fusion cell will remain
>turned on at all times, and when the driver turns on the car and prepares
>to drive off, the cold fusion cell will be boosted high temperatures as
>quickly as possible to drive a steam turbine or thermoelectric device. If
>that can be done in 30 seconds or so, then you need only a small number of
>batteries, like today's standard Prius. You might even use direct
>mechanical drive from a steam turbine. Although people might object to
>having to wait 30 seconds before driving off. That might be dangerous.

I don't think we can make the assumption that that's what Rossi meant. I suspect
he meant from a cold start. It probably hasn't occurred to him yet that someone
might leave it running continuously at a low rate.

I think he needs to be asked if there an 'idle' setting that will allow quick
heat up to full power, and if so, how much power would be produced during 'idle'
mode?

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to