Kyle: If you are so bothered by the few tens of postings about MY in the last week, where was your objections to MY's 900 postings in 2 months, mostly about things that had already been conclude months before she started posting (11/10/2011); most of which were her speculations and suspicions about Rossi and the potential that it was all just pure scam? Funny you should scream about a few days of chastising now, but made NO COMMENT WHATSOEVER when it was Mary barraging the forum with hundreds of postings a week! She (he) is a cowardly skeptic who hid behind the veil of anonymity claiming she feared for her life because of threatening emails and such... she (he) is a liar... exactly what she was accusing Rossi of. -Mark
-----Original Message----- From: Kyle Mcallister [mailto:kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 9:58 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:A huge Rossi (bad) thing to be revealed soon. (Daniele Passerini) --- On Sat, 1/28/12, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > As the one who 'rode her ass' a number of times, I have said that her > (his) technical criticisms were WELCOME... but to lay off the focus on > the personalities. Good idea. Discussing the science and analysis of the tests is what we should be talking about. Except that you and others are now doing exactly what you say she was banned for. Focusing on the personal nature/personalities. Why don't you do as you suggested before, drop this garbage, and let us get back to the real heart of the matter, the technology (whatever it is) itself? But it's a much different taste when the tables are turned, isn't it? You (not just you personally, Mark, a bunch of you) really didn't like what Mary had to say, and it pissed you off so much you just can't drop it. You have to dig it back up and keep going with it. The desire for the last word, the last insult, is just too much. And who can blame you? No one. You're only human, after all, and just as fallible as any of the skeptics you so despise. Meanwhile, the rest of us are all hoping, or praying, whatever the case may be, for a truly revolutionary thing that gives us essentially free (or at least far cheaper) heat during the winter, or clean water. > She ignored all suggestions and continued with the barrage of > postings... She (he) deserved to be banned, and this forum is much > better off and more functional without her (his) presence. Yes, by my count things have drastically improved. In the last 24 hours, only a little greater than 50% of postings to Vortex-L have had to do with Mary's identity and motivations. Yes, indeed, this is grand progress. Good work, gentlemen, pat yourselves on the back. Three posts of the many in this thread have to do with the original topic. The rest have to do with the Mary legacy. Think about that. And maybe, just maybe, drop this garbage, and let's get back to the fun stuff that Vortex used to be about. --Kyle
