Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Chemically Assisted Transmutation Reaction (CATR) expert:  Yes, certain
> chemical reactions are known to produce tritium. Those reactions should be
> regulated by the NRC or band. Those reactions use the hydrogen isotope
> deuterium.

A chemical reaction cannot produce tritium. That is a transmutation; a
change to the nucleus. The definition of chemistry is a reaction limited to
the electrons.

That is the present definition, anyway. "Chemical transmutation" is a
contradiction of terms, like "a living corpse" or "a solid gas."

If cold fusion with deuterium can cause transmutations with products such
as tritium, then it stands to reason that cold fusion with hydrogen might
also cause transmutations. There is already experimental evidence that it
can cause bursts of neutrons.

There is no way -- absolutely, positively, no way on God's green earth --
that experts testifying before Congress any time in the next decade will
claim that the theory is settled, and we know for sure this is a benign
chemical effect that should not be under the purview of the NRC or other
nuclear regulators. That question can only be settled after thousands of
researchers replicate the effect and assess it in far greater detail than
anyone has done until now. It cannot be settled until the theorists reach
some sort of consensus about the nature of the reaction. They need a
working model, if not a theory. We are far from that. Probably hundreds of
millions of dollars away from that, if not billions.

The physics establishment is not going to throw away the definitions of
chemistry versus nuclear physics, and accept unconditionally that there is
such a thing as "chemical transmutation," and that we should not worry
about the effects of that mysterious new phenomenon. It should not accept
that! It would be the height of irresponsibility for physicists to accept
this. We know practically nothing about cold fusion. The research has
barely begun. As I said at ICCF17, in the whole history of the field, we
have spent roughly as much money as people spend on semiconductor R&D *in a
single day*. I repeat: by the standards of industrial R&D, cold fusion is
one day old.

- Jed

Reply via email to