At this point your apparent inability to read the difference between the words "Bob" and "John" is beyond plausible.
Why are you engaging in this obfuscation, J. Beene? On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Rohner made the claim, but no one is under an obligation to provide Bowery > with documentation. > > Obviously, whoever filed the complaint with the FBI presented them with > adequate information to make the raid. > > If Bowery wants to confront the FBI with his belief that Rohner is in the > clear, more power to him > > Jones > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harry Veeder > > Even if he never made the claim explicitly, he wants people to infer > he has such device. > > Unfortunately or fortunately (depending on your point view) the law > doesn`t protect people from such mind games. > > Harry > > James Bowery wrote: > > Clearly John Rohner claimed he had a self-running motor. Clearly Josef > Papp > > claimed he had a self-running motor. > > > > Just as clearly, since you responded to my message which mentioned Bob > > Rohner only, and laid it on the line that I had done reasonably diligent > > search for such claims from Bob Rohner, you are certain that Bob Rohner > > claimed he had a self-running motor. > > > > You are now obligated to support your position by pointing to any > evidence > > of such claim by Bob Rohner. > > > >
